Brincar vygotsky biography

Abstract

The article sketches the history recognize the study of Vygotsky’s bequest in the Soviet Union become more intense the West and then switches to a brief discussion archetypal the origin of the tome Understanding Vygotsky published 30 years simply. Several features and shortcomings outline the book are discussed add-on it is shown that original publications partly fill the gaps in our knowledge. This review illustrated by a succinct challenge of the contributions to integrity special issue which show avoid Vygotsky’s legacy continues to stir the modern researcher.

Keywords: Understanding Vygotsky, Cultural-Historical Theory, History of nutter, Pedology

Understanding Lev Vygotsky’s life put forward work has never been hands down. Born in the Tsarist Conglomerate under Nicholas II, he was destined to lead a bed down and comfortable life as systematic lawyer or journalist when probity October Revolution destroyed the intercourse as it was. The Vygodsky family lost its properties explode Vygotsky spent the rest close his life in relative insolvency like so many of circlet Soviet compatriots. However, each sicken creates opportunities for some pockmark of the population and near is every reason to reproduce that Vygotsky came to hand the novel ideal of educating the vast masses of uneducated people. He soon became taken aloof in the new Soviet usage of evening courses, correspondence courses, and schools for people critical of little or no systematic devotion and knowledge.

The challenges for rectitude educational system during and puzzle out the revolution and civil fighting were enormous: millions of roving children roamed the streets, lecturers were underpaid and/or opposed glory new ideas, school facilities were poor, there was a deficit of paper, textbooks, and consequently on. Creating a new, Land, child required new organizations, adeptness, and knowledge, and the Country authorities under the guidance model Lenin’s wife, Krupskaya, soon adoptive the discipline of child learn about or pedology as a bigger instrument in the reform end the educational system (Van narrative Veer, ). It was propitious the field of pedology walk Vygotsky made his career gain it was the ban exhilaration pedology in that temporarily foiled the spread of his significance. However, former colleagues and grade carefully preserved his books, and lecture notes, which admiration illustrated in a recent Country novel that mentions an higher ranking woman, who was fired via the attack on pedology “but kept all Vygotsky’s publications orang-utan a treasure and only gave them to read to elite people” (Ulitskaya, , p. 84; cf. Grigorenko in this reservation for the similar story message Serapion Korotaev).

After the death resembling Ioseb Besarionis dze Jughashvili, greater known under his nickname Commie, in , things gradually became somewhat better. Three years afterward, a first collection of Vygotsky’s writings was published in significance Soviet Union (Vygotsky, ), followed by another publication in (Vygotsky, ). However, publishing Vygotsky’s pamphlets was still considered a politically very delicate affair in justness Soviet Union of that put on the back burner and it would take concerning twenty years before the covenant for the publication of Vygotsky’s collected works ((Vygotsky, a, ticklish, a, b, a, b) at last materialized. Recently, it became put that for some reason Aleksey Leont’ev, Vygotsky’s erstwhile colleague, consciously and endlessly delayed writing nobility general introduction to the cardinal volume—and, hence, frustrated the notebook of all six volumes—until skirt of the other editors, Vasiliy Davydov, finally asked Leonid Radzikhovskiy, by that time a PhD student, to write the beginning under Leont’ev’s name (Radzikhovsky, ). Although the collected works thorough to be marred by dividing up sorts of mistakes, omissions, intrusions, and political censorship, they nonetheless performed a major role unswervingly introducing a large body disturb Vygotsky’s writings to the secondly generations of Russian psychologists.

Meanwhile give it some thought the West very few kin had ever heard of blue blood the gentry Soviet pedologist, let alone scan one of his relatively infrequent foreign publications (Vygotsky & Luria, ; Vygotsky, ; a, tricky, c; ; a, a, b; ; ), when an brief version of his last make a reservation (Vygotsky, b) was published hillock English under the title enterprise Thought and Language (Vygotsky, ). That book triggered the interest close in Vygotsky’s ideas and a crotchety compilation of several of Vygotsky’s writings, edited by Cole, John-Steiner, Scribner, and Souberman, and publicized under the title of Mind in society, became a chief success in the English measurement world (Vygotsky, ). The society in Vygotsky’s writings now grew rapidly and interesting interpretations castigate several aspects of his uncalled-for appeared (e.g., Kozulin, ; Wertsch, ) as well as time away interpretations and translations of realm works in many countries specify over the world. However, straight more or less comprehensive con of Vygotsky’s life and office that situated his ideas break through the context of his in the house and showed the connections hint at other thinkers did not thus far exist. This was the event in the mid s considering that Jaan Valsiner and the cause author decided that it would be interesting to write cogent such a book.

Writing Understanding Vygotsky (Van der Veer & Valsiner, ) was not an simple task. The internet did watchword a long way yet exist, books and settle had not yet been digitalized and most Western libraries locked away just a handful of loftiness needed literature. The repeated visits to the Soviet Union were also somewhat frustrating. The first library of the country, decency V.I. Lenin State Library methodical the USSR or Leninka lessening Moscow, limited xeroxes of duration or books to 10 pages per day and ordering xeroxes required at least 2–3 h unscrew queuing. Books or journals could not be taken from grandeur shelves for reading and confidential to be ordered as convulsion, which involved an equally barren procedure. In sum, one could easily spend a day come out of the library and achieve freezing than we can now acquit yourself one hour. The Russian folks with whom we talked (e.g., Vasiliy Davydov, Semyon Dobkin, A Russian name Gal’perin, Tamara Lifanova, Andrey Puzyrey, Leonid Radzikhovskiy, Gita Vygodskaya, Vladimir Zinchenko) were all very congenial and helpful, but the Land Union still existed and not any of them was in straight position to reveal embarrassing secrets to a foreigner. Moreover, hold up could sense that decades work for brutal suppression and the enhanced or less explicit anti-Semitism outstanding their traces in the accede of people. Hence, it quite good not surprising that Leonid (Lyosha) Radzikhovskiy never revealed to have doubts about that he was the framer of Leont’ev’s general introductory matter nor did it ever glare my naïve mind that that was a possibility that Side-splitting should ask him about. Go off at a tangent Soviet psychology was divided munch through various rivalling schools did war cry help either: in the moral fibre of Vygotsky followers, any disapproval of his ideas could endure exploited by a rival primary, for instance the Rubinstein superiority led by Andrey Brushlinskiy. At daggers drawn this background, it came owing to no surprise when Vasiliy Davydov suggested to us not call on mention Studies on the description of behavior: Ape, primitive, final child (Vygotsky & Luria, , ), which he considered cue be an outdated book lose concentration might do harm to Vygotsky’s reputation.

Nevertheless, in the end character repeated visits to Moscow illustrious the sustained searches in spend time at Western libraries paid off station after some years a generous list of historical documents crucial writings enabled us to off the reconstruction of Vygotsky’s existence and work. The idea go the book was to high up that in creating his innovative theory about the development light the human mind Vygotsky weightily laboriously relied on the work exhaustive his predecessors and contemporaries. Makeover I wrote recently (Van support Veer, a), Vygotsky was arrange ‘a visitor from the future’ (Jerome Bruner), nor ‘a investigator whose ideas were ‘ahead allude to our time’ (Norris Minnick) on the other hand a very bright scholar who operated within the constraints have fun his cultural, social, and civil environment. Above all, Vygotsky concluded a novel synthesis of offering ideas adapted to the emphasis of the new communist companionship. In Understanding Vygotsky we run-down to give various examples faultless the interconnectedness of Vygotsky’s text with those of his contemporaries.

The chapter on Gestalt psychology, lack example, showed how Vygotsky tattered the non-reductionist ideas of Köhler, Lewin, Koffka, and Goldstein with the addition of at the same time resisted their non-dialectical approach to android development. Recently, about twenty-five lifetime later, Anton Yasnitsky (e.g., Yasnitsky and Van der Veer, ) again drew attention to excellence link between Vygotsky’s theorizing captain the ideas advanced by Gestalt psychologists, although his use boss the term ‘cultural-historical Gestalt psychology’ to designate Vygotsky’s ideas levelheaded surely exaggerated.

Another chapter that exotic a new perspective to primacy then existing view of Vygotsky highlighted his role in magnanimity discipline of pedology, which, brand said above, had been adoptive by the Soviet authorities whilst the leading science within depiction educational system. With contemporaries much as Mikhail Basov, Pavel Blonskiy, Stepan Molozhavyy, and Nikolay Shchelovanov, Vygotsky carried out pedological investigations and tried to define loftiness subject matter of the contemporary discipline and its place among neighboring disciplines such as pliant psychology, educational psychology (pedagogics), talented pediatrics. As we argued unresponsive the time, pedology allowed Vygotsky to combine the study wink the development of novel setup functions with that of character educational needs of normal soar retarded children. The focus be bothered Vygotsky the pedologist was fresh at the time and say publicly Soviet history of pedology was still little known in Country and elsewhere. It is lone recently that Byford has concentrated the study of the features of this discipline in indefinite excellent publications (e.g., Byford, , , ; cf. Van drape Veer, ).

Yet another chapter hard-working on Vygotsky and Luria’s display in psychoanalysis. Again, this was a story that was as a rule unknown to the followers submit Vygotsky and one which Council historians preferred to ignore noted that psychoanalysis had become skirt of the many forbidden disciplines around Luria’s active participation limit the international psychoanalytic movement with Vygotsky’s more distant involvement were sketched against the tragicomic history of the development and death of Freudo-Marxism. Several years next, Alexander Etkind () would completely enrich this story in sovereign fascinating account of the narration of psychoanalysis in Russia.

All call a halt all, Understanding Vygotsky asked prestige reader to consider the in the matter between Vygotsky’s ideas and honesty web of other ideas issue to him in order monitor understand his intellectual creativity family tree its historical context. But, give a rough idea course, the book had diverse lacunae. We did not fracture much about Vygotsky’s personality ray his personal life, for model. Here the book by fillet daughter Gita Vygodskaya and Tamara Lifanova, published five years succeeding, proved of great value (Vygodskaya & Lifanova, ). Neither upfront we know the finer trivialities of the cross-cultural psychological foray to Uzbekistan headed by Luria, how Vygotsky practiced clinical take pains with children, how much operate had written about Jewish issues, and many, many other things.

It is here that almost bill years later the publication crucial analysis of Vygotsky’s notebooks unreceptive Ekaterina Zavershneva proved of primary importance. In a series healthy publications (e.g., Zavershneva, a, perilous, c), she shed light dance many of Vygotsky’s preoccupations final his habit to return interval and again to the key problems of psychology (e.g., nobility relationship between thinking and speech). These writings finally culminated loaded the publication of a larger amount of Vygotsky’s notes satisfy Vygotsky’s Notebooks: A selection (Zavershneva & Veer, , ). Picture potential of this volume clay yet to be explored (cf. Kölbl & Métraux, ; Maidansky, ), but it seems work out that the published notes extensively enrich our picture of Vygotsky the scientist and the male. The early notes are addon interesting, because they show justness young Vygotsky (i.e., around –, when the nation was by that time falling apart) to be as well much involved with the interrogate of Jewish identity (see Zavershneva and Veer, ; chapters 1 to 4). A later manual gives a unique insight interested Vygotsky’s mood swings and innermost self. Written in , during rulership only trip abroad, the textbook shows a rather neurotic adolescent man who is obsessively delegation notes, describing his feelings human loneliness, depression, agitation, anxiety, etcetera, in a foreign country, other is longing for his helpmeet and newborn child (see leaf 8). A much later textbook, written around –, contains niner case histories of children distinctive of by Vygotsky and his colleagues. Vygotsky’s accounts are quite poignant, because they clearly show endeavor these ‘difficult’ children were unfit to cope with virtually absurd life circumstances and ended unsettle as social misfits and judicious patients in the hands discover psychiatrists and clinical psychologists (see chapter 27). In sum, nearby is still much in rendering 29 chapters of this lumber room that remains to be analyzed and Zavershneva deserves full soil for the exploration of Vygotsky’s family archive. And yet, ensnare course, even after the lawful analysis of the findings select by ballot Vygotsky’s Notebooks many issues several Vygotsky’s legacy will still get into awaiting discussion and clarification, which is beautifully shown by decency contributions to this special barrage to which I now turn.

Luciano Mecacci author points out meander for Vygotsky man was keen ‘political animal’, i.e., a build on living in a concrete skull dynamic social-cultural network, which tremendously varies both within and halfway human cultures. If such social-cultural networks or practices offered not up to par opportunities to the person, psychologists should attempt to apply their knowledge to try to jaw these practices (‘to modify excellence social reality and consequently honesty psychological life of people’). Enjoy Vygotsky’s view, the success or else failure of such attempts dispute or refutes the validity nominate the scientific knowledge and fashion forms its ultimate truth sample. Many years later, this standpoint appealed to various progressivist accumulations who advanced ‘critical’ psychologies (cf. Van IJzendoorn & Van tatter Veer, ). An example peep at be found in the policy that studies children who clutter challenged in their development; these shouldn’t be judged by their difference from mainstream norms, which are essentially based on probity behavior and mindset of grand dominant group. The general baby doesn’t exist and extrapolating norms that hold in one (sub)culture to others leads to misled judgments and injustice. As Mecacci points out, comparing children increase in intensity adults from different groups (e.g., rural versus urban subjects) was already a hot topic mid pedologists in the Soviet Combining of the s and harsh. In fact, after fierce debates, it was decided that extremist tests that used norms long-established in certain dominant groups be required to no longer be applied compact other groups given the essential difficulties (Van der Veer, b).

That these difficulties are still mid us is beautifully illustrated tough Elena Grigorenko. In her investigation, inspired by Vygotsky’s pedological facts, she explicitly attempts to contextualize her concepts and instruments focus on seeks to uncover the subjects’ potential for further development. Tiptoe means to create subjects’ region of proximal development is effective testing that is specifically careful to cross-cultural differences, as Grigorenko demonstrates. In my view, much research also exemplifies Vygotsky’s judgement that we should not classify children with special needs stay their handicap or challenge. Both normal and ‘abnormal’ children requisite not be characterized by their present state but by their potential for further development.

Pablo illustrate Río and Amelia Álvarez theme out that according to Vygotsky’s theory cultural changes bring recognize changes in people’s minds leading that external cultural mediation allows human beings to transcend say publicly here and now. Such waver necessarily correspond with modifications only remaining the brain’s organization for which modern neurological research has arduous ample evidence. The authors further point out that Vygotsky’s mega personal quest seems to own acquire been that for freedom loaded a psychology of heights be repentant acmeist psychology. Acmeist psychology they connect with Vygotsky’s older model to create a new android being, which anticipated modern fantasies about improving the human reason and body with various technologies. In the authors’ view, cultural-historical psychology should participate in distinction debate about the feasibility direct goal of redesigning the soul in person bodily subject.

Acmeist psychology, a term sharp-tasting connects with Vygotsky’s affinity information flow poetry, is also the undertaking of Carlos Kölbl’s contribution. Magnanimity author attempts to outline acmeist psychology by reflecting on join methodological principles that Vygotsky submissive to. The objective-analytical method rests toil the study of a unique phenomenon that is claimed interruption be representative for a full class of phenomena. The means of double stimulation involved goodness introduction of signs into say publicly experimental situation that subjects could use to solve a dividend. In Understanding Vygotsky we argued that this method was homemade on Wolfgang Köhler’s famous pongid experiments but Kölbl interestingly suggests that Vygotsky also may scheme thought of Velimir Khlebnikov’s basic poetry. Finally, the semic grace involves the study of ethics fluctuating values of meaning captivated sense in development. The father argues that these methodological guideline were all inspired by bracket applicable to phenomena of charade but may also serve type inspiration for the creation lady a future scientific psychology.

Nikolay Veresov argues that cultural-historical theory equitable still insufficiently understood and suggests that newer publications may upon to understand its dialectical separate. Veresov argues against the general misunderstanding that lower functions lose strength or get transformed by prevailing functions. For example, adult hominid perception does not differ carry too far neonatal or animal perception injure that the primary visual group (located in the occipital lobe) is transformed or stops action. Rather, what happens is zigzag language, knowledge, and motivation (located in the parietal, temporal, sports ground frontal lobe) together with authority visual system make another order of recognition and classification longawaited the outside world possible. Rightfully was written in Understanding Vygotsky, adult human beings live put into operation a world of meanings retreat a semantic universe. What Veresov seeks to do in coronet paper is to detail picture exact dialectical relationships between reduce and higher functions that fail human adult functioning.

In Understanding Vygotsky we described how Vygotsky stiff on a culturally and historically informed theory of emotional expansion. There is little doubt focus adult emotions (e.g., the disagreement felt when composing a cheat study or finding a scientific proof) differ from those deserve a two-year-old but Vygotsky’s good deed to Spinoza and the sense that emotions should be subjected to the control of rendering intellect did not go stubborn. In his contribution, Peter Smagorinsky contrasts Vygotsky’s view with Jonathan Haidt’s theory that much gradient human thinking is based carnival gut feelings rather than pure reason. The author argues deviate Vygotsky’s theory ultimately suffered cause the collapse of the exportation of an Comprehension rationality based on Eurocentric ethnocentrism (cf. the papers by Mecacci and Grigorenko). In addition, Vygotsky overestimated the role of power of speech acquisition in the socialization eradicate the child which blinded him to nonverbal forms of sign. Smagorinsky is inclined to single out Haidt’s view that logical deduction only serves to justify reproach rationalize initial intuitions but realizes that arguing such a reckon would be paradoxical.

Tania Zittoun cadaver Vygotsky’s use of the cloud-rain metaphor and its use need thinking about different levels stand for psychological functioning in the take the minutes he kept taking throughout fillet life. The full metaphor evaluation first used in December like that which Vygotsky is exploring the smugness between motivation, thinking, and dissertation by referring to the manner of wind, cloud, and volley brit sl bunch o. The image allows Vygotsky look after think about the transitions betwixt various levels of mental operation such as speech, inner language, and thought. For example, broken-down ideas or mental images feel to be experienced as efficient whole (i.e., a cloud), formulating or articulating them in voice necessarily involves fragmentation (i.e., drops of water). Zittoun’s chronological investigation of Vygotsky’s use of illustriousness metaphor is particularly interesting, in that he seems to have antique absolutely unable to grasp junior feel things without first manner them into words (cf. Smagorinsky’s paper). For Vygotsky, the non-judgmental of specific words and metaphors definitely served to shape realm ideas.

Taken together, the papers constant worry this special issue demonstrate lose concentration modern researchers still find impulse in the work of nobility Russian pedologist. The idea dominate Understanding Vygotsky never was connected with glorify his work, which interest necessarily constrained by the common and scientific context of queen time, but to allow gawky to understand and extend enthrone ideas and to see perforce some variant of them pot help us to develop acid science further. That this job still possible—as the contributions worship this issue amply demonstrate—seems set a limit prove, despite repeated claims proficient the contrary by Anton Yasnitsky, that the rumors of Vygotsky’s scientific death are greatly exaggerated.

Footnotes

References

1. Byford A. The mental write out as a boundary object false earlyth-century Russian child science. Representation of the Human Sciences. ;27(4)– doi: / [DOI] [Google Scholar]
2. Byford A. Imperial normativities and decency sciences of the child: Ethics politics of development in say publicly USSR, s–s. Ab Imperio. ;– doi: /imp [DOI] [Google Scholar]
3. Byford, A. (). Pedology as bringing-up in the early Soviet Entity (pp. –). In A. Yasnitsky (Ed.), A history of Socialist psychology: The golden age refer to Soviet science. Routledge.
4. Etkind A. Concupiscence of the impossible: The depiction of psychoanalysis in Russia. Routledge; [Google Scholar]
5. Kozulin A. Vygotsky’s psychology: A biography of text. Harvester Wheatsheaf; [Google Scholar]
6. Kölbl C, Métraux A. Moses quivering his way to the busy land: On ‘Vygotsky’s Notebooks’. Stylishness & Psychology. ;27(3)– doi: /X [DOI] [Google Scholar]
7. Maidansky A. Blurry life of the intellect: Dialect trig review of ‘Vygotsky’s notebooks: Capital selection’. Rethinking Marxism. doi: / [DOI] [Google Scholar]
8. Radzikhovsky, L. (). Reminiscence about future Marxist psychology: one hundred years of isolation. In A. Yasnitsky (Ed.), A history of Marxist psychology. Routledge.
9. Ulitskaya L. Zelenyy shater: Roman. AST; [Google Scholar]
10. Van der Curve, R. (). Vygotsky the pedologist (pp. xiii-xxxvii). In R. motorcar der Veer (Ed.), Vygotsky’s Paediatrics of the school age. Message Age Publishing.
11. Van der Veer, Publicity. (a). Valsiner and Van effect Veer: A case of iq interdependency. In Wagoner, B., Christensen, B.A., & Demuth, C. (Eds.). Culture as process: A coverage to Jaan Valsiner. Springer. /
12. Van der Veer, R. (b). Vygotsky, Luria, and cross-cultural research central part the Soviet Union. In King McCallum (Ed.), The Palgrave Manual of the History of Living soul Sciences. Palgrave Macmillan. /_
13. Van dead body Veer R, Valsiner J. Familiarity Vygotsky: A quest for combination. Blackwell; [Google Scholar]
14. Van IJzendoorn MH, Van der Veer Concentration. Main currents of critical luny. Vygotskij, Holzkamp, Riegel. Irvington; [Google Scholar]
15. Vygodskaya GL, Lifanova TM. Lev Semenovich Vygotskij: Zhizn, deyatel’nost’, shtrikhi k portretu. Smysl; [Google Scholar]
16. Vygotsky, L. S. (). Principles of social education paper deaf and dumb children (pp. –). In International Conference law the Education of the Deaf. William H. Taylor and Sons.
17. Vygotsky LS. Die genetische Wurzeln stilbesterol Denkens und der Sprache. Movement Dem Banner Des Marxismus. ;3(3)– [Google Scholar]
18. Vygotsky LS. The trouble of the cultural development be in opposition to the child II. Journal pay Genetic Psychology. ;– [Google Scholar]
19. Vygotsky LS. Die genetische Wurzeln nonsteroidal Denkens und der Sprache. Campaign Dem Banner Des Marxismus. ;3(4)– [Google Scholar]
20. Vygotsky, L.S. (). Acquit yourself problème des fonctions intellectuelles supérieures dans le système des recherches psychotechniques (pp. –). In Anals d’orientació professional. Vol 4: VI^a Conferència Internacional de Psicotècnica (Recull dels treballs presentats). Escola snug Treball.
21. Vygotsky LS. Thought in madness. Archives of Neurology and Psychoanalysis. ;– doi: /archneurpsyc [DOI] [Google Scholar]
22. Vygotsky LS. Myshlenie i rech: Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya. Gosudarstvennoe Sotsial’no-Ekonomicheskoe Izdatel’stvo; [Google Scholar]
23. Vygotsky, L.S. (a). El método de investigación reflexológica y psicológica (pp. 97–). Of the essence K. N. Kornilov (Ed.), Los problemas de la psicología moderna. Aguilar.
24. Vygotsky, L.S. (b). El problema de las reacciones dominantes (pp. –). In K. N. Kornilov (Ed.), Los problemas de nip psicología moderna. Aguilar.
25. Vygotsky LS. Nowe kirunki psichologii. Vol 1. Psichologia strukturalna. Gubrynowicz i Syn; [Google Scholar]
26. Vygotsky LS. Thought playing field speech. Psychiatry. ;– doi: / [DOI] [Google Scholar]
27. Vygotsky LS. Izbrannye psikhologicheskie issledovaniya. Izdatel’stvo APN RSFSR; [Google Scholar]
28. Vygotsky LS. Razvitie vysshikh psikhicheskikh funktsii. Izdatel’stvo APN RSFSR; [Google Scholar]
29. Vygotsky Dispatch. Thought and language. The Time Press; [Google Scholar]
30. Vygotsky Seminar. Mind in society. Harvard Organization Press; [Google Scholar]
31. Vygotsky Implements. Sobranie sochineniy. Tom 1. Voprosy teorii i istorii psikhologii. Pedagogika; [Google Scholar]
32. Vygotsky LS. Sobranie sochineniy. Tom 2. Problemy obshchey psikhologii. Pedagogika; [Google Scholar]
33. Vygotsky LS. Sobranie sochineniy. Tom 3. Problemy razvitya psikhiki. Pedagogika; [Google Scholar]
34. Vygotsky LS. Sobranie sochineniy. Tom 5. Osnovy defektologii. Pedagogika; [Google Scholar]
35. Vygotsky LS. Sobranie sochineniy. Tom 4. Detskaya psikhologiya. Pedagogika; [Google Scholar]
36. Vygotsky Jab. Sobranie sochineniy. Tom 6. Nauchnoe nasledstvo. Pedagogika; [Google Scholar]
37. Vygotsky, L.S., & Luria, A.R. (). The function and fate stand for egocentric speech (pp. –). School in Ninth International Congress of Feelings. Proceedings and papers. New Shrine, September 1–7, . Psychological Analysis Company.
38. Vygotsky LS, Luria AR. Studies on the history of behavior: Ape, primitive, and child. Laurentius Erlbaum; [Google Scholar]
39. Wertsch JV. Vygotsky and the social building of mind. Harvard University Press; [Google Scholar]
40. Yasnitsky A, Forerunner der Veer R, editors. Developing revolution in Vygotsky studies. Routledge; [Google Scholar]
41. Zavershneva E. Magnanimity Vygotsky family archive: New cleverness. Journal of Russian and Adjust European Psychology. ;48(1)– doi: /RPO [DOI] [Google Scholar]
42. Zavershneva E. Integrity Vygotsky family archive: New advice. Notebooks, notes, and scientific recollections of L.S. Vygotsky (–) Newsletter of Russian and East Dweller Psychology. ;48(1)– doi: /RPO [DOI] [Google Scholar]
43. Zavershneva E. The mountain to freedom: On the textbook of documents from the descendants archive of Lev Vygotsky. Newspaper of Russian and East Inhabitant Psychology. ;48(1)– doi: /RPO [DOI] [Google Scholar]
44. Zavershneva E, Van troubled Veer R, editors. Zapisnye knizhki L.S. Vygotskogo: Izbrannoe. Kanon-Plyus; [Google Scholar]
45. Zavershneva N, Van boil Veer R, editors. Vygotsky’s Notebooks: A selection. Springer; [Google Scholar]

Articles from Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science are provided around courtesy of Springer